radikal.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
radikal.social was created by a group of activists to offer federated social media for the radical left in and around Denmark.

Administered by:

Server stats:

164
active users
Anarkitty<p><a href="https://www.columnblog.com/p/jeffrey-goldberg-dismissing-yemeni?publication_id=463034" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">columnblog.com/p/jeffrey-goldb</span><span class="invisible">erg-dismissing-yemeni?publication_id=463034</span></a></p><p><a href="https://radikal.social/tags/jeffreygoldberg" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>jeffreygoldberg</span></a><br /><a href="https://radikal.social/tags/yemen" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>yemen</span></a></p>
Anarkitty
Anarkitty<p><a href="https://radikal.social/tags/memes" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>memes</span></a></p>
Anarkitty
Anarkitty
Anarkitty<p>I don&#39;t know about you guys but when I was a kid I was just genuinely completely disinterested in my peers, I was very much living up to the &#39;self-absorbed&#39; etymology of the word autism, and still do in some ways though I&#39;ve managed to train myself to be a bit more caring and interested in other people now. I don&#39;t wanna pretend I was never selfish and annoying I just think I shouldn&#39;t be pathologized and persecuted for it lol</p><p><a href="https://radikal.social/tags/autism" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>autism</span></a></p>
Anarkitty<p>I feel like there&#39;s a strong urge among neurodiversity advocates to reinterpret every autistic symptom to be really prosocial in order to make us more palatable. Like &quot;Infodumping is about bonding&quot;, maybe sometimes it is. Sometimes it also happens because we&#39;re simply more fixated on some topic than on other people in that moment. Sometimes we&#39;re just airing out thoughts and honestly just don&#39;t think so much of the recipient, and don&#39;t think so much of the social content of what we say.<br /><a href="https://radikal.social/tags/autism" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>autism</span></a></p>
Anarkitty<p>&quot;Men kongehuset skaffer en masse indtægt til Danmark gennem turisme!&quot;</p><p>Fedt nok! Så hvis vi er heldige vil afskaffelsen af kongehuset også afskaffe turisme, win win situation</p>
Anarkitty
Anarkitty<p>Hvad jeg læser lige nu:<br />-Palestine af Joe Sacco<br />-Imperiets Børn af Anne Kirstine Hermann<br />-Kurt Vonnegut samling (lige nu er det Cat&#39;s Cradle)<br />-Svensk oversættelse af Language of the Third Reich af Victor Klemperer</p>
Anarkitty<p>Nogle aktivister som vil være med til at organisere en protest mod Tesla i København? Send mig en privat besked og jeg kan få jer i touch med nogle folk.</p><p><a href="https://radikal.social/tags/aktivisme" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>aktivisme</span></a></p>
Anarkitty
Anarkitty
Anarkitty<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://radikal.social/@CRAC" class="u-url mention">@<span>CRAC</span></a></span> Jeg har fået svar på min klage fra DR som holder sig til at der ikke er noget galt med deres dækning. De virker til at mene det er fint nok at kun udlægge Mærsks narrativ i detaljer mens de bare linker til aktivisternes hjemmeside. Det virker som om de tror mit problem handler om fakta og ikke om hvordan perspektiverne balanceres. Tror I det er værd at klage igen eller skrive til pressenævnet?<br /><a href="https://radikal.social/tags/pal%C3%A6stina" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>palæstina</span></a> <a href="https://radikal.social/tags/maskoffmaersk" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>maskoffmaersk</span></a></p>
Anarkitty
Anarkitty
Anarkitty
Anarkitty
Anarkitty<p>Fucked up </p><p><a href="https://www.krone.at/3668354" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="">krone.at/3668354</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p><a href="https://radikal.social/tags/climatecris" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>climatecris</span></a></p>
Anarkitty<p>Steve Silberman&#39;s &quot;Neurotribes&quot; was my first introduction to the history of autism but as the years have passed and I&#39;ve adopted an increasingly more psychiatry critical perspective I can now see how the book ends up actually obscuring a lot of that history in favor of legitimizing the current diagnostic status quo. This short article digs into it very well:</p><p><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369848616300954?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">sciencedirect.com/science/arti</span><span class="invisible">cle/pii/S1369848616300954?via%3Dihub</span></a></p><p><a href="https://radikal.social/tags/autism" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>autism</span></a> <a href="https://radikal.social/tags/antipsychiatry" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>antipsychiatry</span></a></p>